|
Go To
![]() |
Post
![]() |
Search BB
![]() |
Notify Me
![]() |
TOS/Tools/Smilies
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
|
AAA+ |
http://www.boston.com/travel/b...spirit_to_charg.html ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Drill, Baby, Still Standing in the Way of Big Goverment is Not Standing in the Way of Progress Nothing Would Be Green Without CO2 |
||
|
|
Forum Host |
Hi,
Public response to Spirit's move has been overwhelmingly poor, and I doubt other airlines will follow suit. But the trend of airlines charging more for everything the public will grumble about but accept will continue. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Jack Adler, Host |
|||
|
|
AAA+ |
What they really should do is enforce the size limitations for carry-on bags.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Drill, Baby, Still Standing in the Way of Big Goverment is Not Standing in the Way of Progress Nothing Would Be Green Without CO2 |
|||
|
Admin![]() |
The original premise for charging extra for checked luggage was to help cover the outrageous fuel costs during the summer of 2008... but that doesn't work as justification for anything other than a corporate money grab per the As price of jet fuel plummets, airline surcharges defy gravity article (written in 09/2008) when jet fuel was was well on its way back down again. Then, in 2009: "The US airline industry collected USD670 million in baggage fees in 2Q2009, up 18.2% from first quarter levels, and a massive 275.7% year-on-year increase, according to Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS)." (Chart showing baggage fee collections from 1Q2005 to 2Q2009 ... "Commencing in early 2008, most of the US carriers commenced charging for the first and second bags checked by passengers. Previously, additional charges were not applied until the third bag was checked. The claimed reason behind the baggage fees was to help the carriers offset high fuel prices, which have subsequently fallen from their highs of around USD145/barrel (WTI) to around USD67/barrel (they are currently down 31% year-on-year). Some US airlines now covering as much as 38% of their total fuel costs in the form of baggage fees, with Spirit, AirTran, US Airways and Frontier's baggage fees reaching 20% or more of total fuel costs in the second quarter." (Table) Source "To lock in the low historical prices Southwest believed were occurring at that time, Southwest used a mixture of swaps and call options to secure fuel in future years while paying prices they believed were low. The company also stated that with this new strategy, it faced substantial risks if the oil prices continued to go down. They did not. Previously, Southwest had been more interested in reducing volatility of oil prices. Now, they hoped to reap large gains from oil price appreciation. In 2001, Southwest again substantially increased its hedging in response to projections of increased crude oil prices. The use of these hedges helped Southwest maintain its profitability during the oil shocks related to the Iraq War and later Hurricane Katrina. According to an annual report, here is the company’s fuel hedge for forward years ("approximate" per barrel basis, as of mid-January): 2007 is 95% hedged at $50/barrel; 2008 is 65% hedged at $49/barrel [when jet fuel hit $145/bbl]; 2009 is over 50% hedged at $51/barrel; 2010 is over 25% hedged at $63/barrel [jet fuel is currently ~$90/bbl]; 2011 is over 15% hedged at $64/barrel; 2012 is 15% hedged at $63/barrel." *CJ |
|||
|
|
Forum Host |
Hi,
Several other airlines have come out publicly on record as against Spirit's move, and Sen. Schumer (D-N.Y.) has even come up with a bill against it. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Jack Adler, Host |
|||
|