Aavid |
Orly Taitz represented one of four plaintiffs challenging President Obama's eligibility for placement on the Democratic ballot in Georgia. The President and his counsel were subpoenaed to appear in court to defend against these challenges, but the President's attorney issued a nice letter to the judge stating that the Court had no business or jurisdiction even hearing the case and therefore the defense would not be in attendance. So Taitz and her fellow attorneys presented their best arguments without challenge from the defense, and requested a summary judgment on the merits. And the Court's judgment: the plaintiffs have no case and no credible evidence, and there is no law to support their claims. Judgment for the defendant, represented only by an empty table, on the merits. Or in this case, utter lack thereof. Daily Kos The decision text Why, oh, why, don't the RWWs just totally disown this idiot? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ “I’m not familiar precisely with exactly what I said, but I stand by what I said, whatever it was.” ---Willard | ||
|
Never goes away... |
interesting footnotes in that decision as to the wong kim ark case and english common law ... i haven't seen a reference to a leige in a looooong time .. lol imo .. the california bar should sanction oily taint .. this is beyond ridiculous by now .. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~Jkat~~~~ "the time has come" the walrus said "to speak of many things ..of ships and shoes and sealing wax .. of cabbages and kings..." "if life is giving you MELONS you might be dyslexic" | |||
|
Steadfast... |
Does Orly Taitz, Esq. ever win? Hire her to defend you in a jaywalking case and she'll get you the death penalty. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Don't Say Say "Obama's Predecessor," if you absolutely have to. | |||
|
| Aavid |
I wouldn't let her work on my teeth either. Or sell me a house. She is one dumb real-estate-selling lawyer-dentist. She needs another $20,000 fine. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ “I’m not familiar precisely with exactly what I said, but I stand by what I said, whatever it was.” ---Willard | |||
|
Devoted... |
'Cause so many want to believe her.  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Tee "Blaming other people for your problems is self-defeating - even if you're right. - WJC | |||
|
| Aavid |
The Birther nonsense doesn't even fly in Georgia. What does that say? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ “I’m not familiar precisely with exactly what I said, but I stand by what I said, whatever it was.” ---Willard | |||
|
| Devoted... |
Maybe that they have decided to rejoin the United States of America.  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Tee "Blaming other people for your problems is self-defeating - even if you're right. - WJC | |||
|
| Aavid |
The judge was equally unimpressed by the claims of attorneys Mark Hatfield and Van Irion, both of whom argued that while a “citizen” is anyone born on U.S. soil regardless of their parents’ citizenship, a “natural-born citizen” must be the offspring of two U.S. citizens. Since the president’s father was never a U.S. citizen, they argued, Obama is constitutionally ineligible for office. Following the logic laid out in a 2009 decision by Indiana’s Court of Appeals, Malihi found that Obama is indeed “natural born.” All three attorneys have vowed to fight on – and Taitz this morning filed a fresh election challenge in Indiana. (Yes, you read that right: Indiana, the very same state upon whose ruling in Obama’s favor formed the basis of Malihi’s ruling against Irion and Hatfield’s argument.) She’s also calling for Malihi’s head, urging readers of her website to call Georgia’s attorney general and “demand immediate criminal investigation of Malihi for public corruption.” Ever suspicious, Taitz also asked on her website if anyone knew what the judge’s middle initial, M, stands for. No one seems to know for sure. But one of her followers has a theory: Based on the 2003 obituary of a Massachusetts man named Hassan Malihi (beloved father of Ladan Khamsi, and Ali, Reza and Mahmood Malihi, but conspicuously not of anyone named Michael), there’s a pretty good chance the judge is an Iranian using a fake name! “Mahmood Malihi is Judge Michael,” proclaims a response posted on Taitz’s website. SPLC Wonkette has a hilarious satirical take ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ “I’m not familiar precisely with exactly what I said, but I stand by what I said, whatever it was.” ---Willard | |||
|
© 2003-2012 Aantares Online LLC. All Rights Reserved.