Aantares
Aantares BB
Your News, Money, Sports
News
Study: Junk food sold in middle schools doesn't cause obesityGo To ![]() | Post ![]() | Search BB ![]() | Notify Me ![]() | TOS/Tools/Smilies ![]() | Reply ![]() | |
| Devoted... |
That's probably it. A good analogy is that most alcoholics don't regularly get drunk in bars because it looks bad to toss fifteen shots in an hour and is far too expensive, so they grab a bottle or two at the off-sale and drown themselves at home. Kids addicted to junk food likely think the same way: boycott the vending machine and pick up a huge bag on the way to school/home for the same price. As compguy suggests, there don't seem to be any studies on overall junk food consumption from myriad sources, but I suspect that the more junk food a kid eats the fatter they are likely to be. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I know the rent is in arrears. The dog has not been fed in years. It's even worse than it appears...but it's alright. We will get by. | |||
|
| Forum Host |
You're confusing two different things. It's perfectly OK to publish data--that's research too. Conclusions based on the data can be the matter of further experimentation and data gathering. There's no need or expectation to publish a fully-formed body of work in a single paper. In particular, I don't see how the first researchers who publish are going to have "an independent determination of linkage" at all. Isn't that for later papers and further research? We're not dealing here with objective laboratory science. This is not a controlled situation, as you could have in a prison or hospital experiment. You're dealing with kids and many influences and parameters over which the experimenters have no control. But the main point of this research was to demonstrate that changing food choices in middle schools would influence obesity rates of the school's students. So far, at least, the evidence hasn't shown that. Jeff | |||
|
Never goes away...![]() |
1. I'm not confused. 2. You said it was easy. I didn't. 3. It's not okay to merely publish data. That's not science. 4. The results of the study are inconclusive. There's no information to gauge the credibility of the data or the experiments used to acquire it. The study abstract upon which you've judged this finding is not scientifically meaningful. You seem to think otherwise. 5. There's good science and bad science. I'm sorry you can't tell the difference. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ What's a purple pentode? Why, it's one that's gassy! | |||
|
| Forum Host |
This is getting silly. 1. I didn't say you were confused; I said you confused two different things. 2. I explained what the "it" was that was easy--it wasn't what you thought I was saying. I admitted I wasn't clear. 3. Of course science is publishing data. It can be more, but publishing data is perfectly acceptable. 4. I agreed that the abstract is a poor substitute for reading the full paper. I pointed out it costs $32 to read the full paper online. You haven't read it either. 5. I don't know whether this is good science or not without reading the paper. Your own point is that you can't tell the difference from an abstract. I already agreed with you. So how can you now say it's bad science? Taking your own argument, you could only say that you don't know whether or not it's bad science. It's not really pure science anyway--it's more sociology/psychology with all the accompanying inadequacies of a study in the real world and not a laboratory. Jeff | |||
|
Never goes away...![]() |
Look up "Science." Publishing data isn't science. Good science isn't confined solely to a laboratory. I do know, on the basis of what has already been said, that Van Hook's work is not good science. I've already said it and why. You're entitled to your opinion. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ What's a purple pentode? Why, it's one that's gassy! | |||
|
| Forum Host |
http://apps.facebook.com/daily...unch-butterworth-1-3 Some background (since I can't quote the full article). Years ago James Oliver went on a campaign in Great Britain to get the schools to put freshly made nutritional food on the menus. He was very successful. Schools got lots of money to implement the new standard.
Just another example of the point I made earlier... Jeff | |||
|
| Powered by Social Strata | Page: 1 2 |
| Thanks! Your request is being processed... |
|
Aantares
Aantares BB
Your News, Money, Sports
News
Study: Junk food sold in middle schools doesn't cause obesity
